"Research on vascular access-related complications in oncology has expanded substantially, while patient-centered topics and standardized vascular access management remain underrepresented" Gezer and Taylan (2026).

Research of vascular access device-related complications in oncology

Abstract:

Background: Vascular access devices (VADs) are essential for delivering systemic anticancer therapies, yet device-related complications remain a major challenge in oncology care.

Objectives: To analyze global research trends and the knowledge structure of vascular access-related complications in oncology using bibliometric methods.

Research design: Bibliometric analysis.

Subjects: A total of 3072 articles and reviews published between 1977 and 2026 and indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection.

Measures: Bibliometric analyses were performed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer to evaluate publication trends, journal productivity, authorship, citation structure, collaboration networks, and thematic development.

Results: Publication output increased markedly after 2020. The Journal of Vascular Access (n = 79) and Supportive Care in Cancer (n = 67) were the most productive journals. Raad I (n = 29), Hachem R (n = 23), and Jiang Y (n = 20) were the leading authors. The literature primarily focused on complication prevention, thrombosis, and catheter-related infections.

Conclusions: Research on vascular access-related complications in oncology has expanded substantially, while patient-centered topics and standardized vascular access management remain underrepresented. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of the field and may help guide future research priorities.


Reference:

Gezer D, Taylan S. Global research landscape of vascular access device-related complications in oncology: A bibliometric analysis. J Vasc Access. 2026 Aug 26:11297298261478740. doi: 10.1177/11297298261478740. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 42644672.