Vascular access devices in pediatric oncology
Highlights:
In pediatric oncology patients, there is limited evidence to guide central venous access device selection.
TIVADs reduce key adverse events in pediatric oncology: compared to tunneled CVCs, TIVADs significantly lower risks of systemic infection, mechanical failure, and premature device removal, favoring their use for long-term chemotherapy access.
TIVADs may be prioritized for pediatric chemotherapy when feasible, taking into account factors such as cost, provider expertise, and patient preference.
Reference:
Liu C, Yang D, Guo X, Wang J, Wang R, Qu H, Liu L. Adverse Events of Tunneled Central Venous Catheters versus Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Jun 21:S1051-0443(25)00416-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.06.008. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40550455.