Objective: While the literature suggests the use of SESDs has had successful results for device securement, it is unknown to what extent they may impact CLABSI rates. Securement and stabilization performance among devices may be a direct risk factor for CLABSIs.
Methods: A retrospective quality review of 7,776 cases was conducted at a large academic medical center. The primary researcher implemented a quantitative design which was analysed with demographics statistics and relative risk ratio.
Results: There was a 288% (n=47) increase in relative risk of CLABSI found in the AESD group compared to the SESD group. The results imply the use of SESDs may improve nursing practice and patient outcomes lowering CLABSI rates in patients with PICCs by a reduction of risks associated with securement design differences.
Conclusion: The use of a subcutaneous engineered securement device (SESD) for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in an acute care setting was found to have a direct impact on central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates compared to traditional adhesive engineered securement devices (AESD).
Reference:Rowe, M.S., Arnold, K. and Spencer, T.R. (2020) Catheter Securement Impact on PICC-related CLABSI: A University Hospital Perspective. American Journal of Infection Control. June 17th. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.178. (epub ahead of print).